• Machiela et al. (2018). Genome-wide association study identifies multiple new loci associated with Ewing sarcoma susceptibility. Nature Communications.
  • Grünewald et al. (2018). Ewing sarcoma. Nature Reviews Disease Primers.
  • Baldauf et al. (2018). Are EWSR1-NFATc2-positive sarcomas really Ewing sarcomas?. Modern Pathology.
  • Tsafou et al. (2018). Targeting Intrinsically Disordered Transcription Factors: Changing the Paradigm. Journal of Molecular Biology.
  • Gorthi et al. (2018). EWS–FLI1 increases transcription to cause R-loops and block BRCA1 repair in Ewing sarcoma. Nature.
  • Çelik et al. (2018). Clofarabine inhibits Ewing sarcoma growth through a novel molecular mechanism involving direct binding to CD99. Oncogene.
  • Baldauf et al. (2017). Robust diagnosis of Ewing sarcoma by immunohistochemical detection of super-enhancer-driven EWSR1-ETS targets. Oncotarget.
  • Hamilton et al. (2017). Long-term Outcomes and Complications in Pediatric Ewing Sarcoma. American Journal of Clinical Oncology.
  • Johnson et al. (2017). Role for the EWS domain of EWS/FLI in binding GGAA-microsatellites required for Ewing sarcoma anchorage independent growth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
  • Sizemore et al. (2017). The ETS family of oncogenic transcription factors in solid tumours. Nature Reviews Cancer.
  • Sechler et al. (2017). The histone demethylase KDM3A and its downstream target MCAM, promote Ewing Sarcoma cell migration and metastasis. Oncogene.
  • Marina et al. (2017). Longitudinal follow-up of adult survivors of Ewing sarcoma: A report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Cancer.
  • Mutz et al. (2017). EWS-FLI1 confers exquisite sensitivity to NAMPT inhibition in Ewing sarcoma cells. Oncotarget.
  • Brohl et al. (2017). Frequent inactivating germline mutations in DNA repair genes in patients with Ewing sarcoma. Genetics in Medicine.
  • Gardiner et al. (2017). C/EBP\upbeta{}{-}{1} promotes transformation and chemoresistance in Ewing sarcoma cells. Oncotarget.
  • Sheffield et al. (2017). DNA methylation heterogeneity defines a disease spectrum in Ewing sarcoma. Nature Medicine.
  • Schwentner et al. (2016). The role of miR-17-92 in the miRegulatory landscape of Ewing sarcoma. Oncotarget.
  • Gordon et al. (2016). Modeling the initiation of Ewing sarcoma tumorigenesis in differentiating human embryonic stem cells. Oncogene.
  • Goss, and Gordon (2016). Gene expression signature based screening identifies ribonucleotide reductase as a candidate therapeutic target in Ewing sarcoma. Oncotarget.
  • Krook et al. (2016). A bivalent promoter contributes to stress-induced plasticity of CXCR4 in Ewing sarcoma. Oncotarget.
  • Pishas, and Lessnick (2016). Recent advances in targeted therapy for Ewing sarcoma. F1000Research.
  • Cash et al. (2016). Comparison of clinical features and outcomes in patients with extraskeletal versus skeletal localized Ewing sarcoma: A report from the Children\textquotesingles Oncology Group. Pediatric Blood {\&} Cancer.
  • Hingorani et al. (2016). Current state of pediatric sarcoma biology and opportunities for future discovery: A report from the sarcoma translational research workshop. Cancer Genetics.
  • Minas et al. (2016). Combined experience of six independent laboratories attempting to create an Ewing sarcoma mouse model. Oncotarget.
  • Theisen et al. (2016). Therapeutic opportunities in Ewing sarcoma: EWS-FLI inhibition via LSD1 targeting. Oncotarget.
  • Osgood et al. (2016). Identification of Mithramycin Analogues with Improved Targeting of the EWS-FLI1 Transcription Factor. Clin. Cancer Res.
  • Kovar et al. (2016). The second European interdisciplinary Ewing sarcoma research summit – A joint effort to deconstructing the multiple layers of a complex disease. Oncotarget.
  • Zhang et al. (2015). Germline Mutations in Predisposition Genes in Pediatric Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med.
  • Gaspar et al. (2015). Ewing Sarcoma: Current Management and Future Approaches Through Collaboration. Journal of Clinical Oncology.
  • Abbott et al. (2015). Abstract 2748: A population-based survey of excess cancers observed in Ewing\textquotesingles sarcoma and in their first-, second-, and third-degree relatives. Cancer Res.
  • Gomez, and Davis (2015). Linking germline and somatic variation in Ewing sarcoma. Nat. Genet.
  • Agelopoulos et al. (2015). Deep Sequencing in Conjunction with Expression and Functional Analyses Reveals Activation of FGFR1 in Ewing Sarcoma. Clin. Cancer Res.
  • Grünewald et al. (2015). Chimeric EWSR1-FLI1 regulates the Ewing sarcoma susceptibility gene EGR2 via a GGAA microsatellite. Nat. Genet.
  • Sand et al. (2015). Sequencing Overview of Ewing Sarcoma: A Journey across Genomic, Epigenomic and Transcriptomic Landscapes. International Journal of Molecular Sciences.
  • Fadul et al. (2015). EWS/FLI utilizes NKX2-2 to repress mesenchymal features of Ewing sarcoma. Genes \& cancer.
  • Selvanathan et al. (2015). Oncogenic fusion protein EWS-FLI1 is a network hub that regulates alternative splicing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
  • Tang et al. (2015). SLFN11 Is a Transcriptional Target of EWS-FLI1 and a Determinant of Drug Response in Ewing Sarcoma. Clin. Cancer Res.
  • Schwentner et al. (2015). EWS-FLI1 employs an E2F switch to drive target gene expression. Nucleic Acids Res.
  • Tomazou et al. (2015). Epigenome mapping reveals distinct modes of gene regulation and widespread enhancer reprogramming by the oncogenic fusion protein EWS-FLI1. Cell Reports.
  • Cripe et al. (2015). Novel Therapies on the Horizon. .
  • Lawlor, and Sorensen (2015). Twenty Years on: What Do We Really Know about Ewing Sarcoma and What Is the Path Forward?. Crit. Rev. Oncog.
  • Choy et al. (2014). Phase II study of olaparib in patients with refractory Ewing sarcoma following failure of standard chemotherapy. {BMC} Cancer.
  • Riggi et al. (2014). EWS-FLI1 Utilizes Divergent Chromatin Remodeling Mechanisms to Directly Activate or Repress Enhancer Elements in Ewing Sarcoma. Cancer Cell.
  • Cornaz-Buros et al. (2014). Targeting Cancer Stem-like Cells as an Approach to Defeating Cellular Heterogeneity in Ewing Sarcoma. Cancer Res.
  • Crompton et al. (2014). The Genomic Landscape of Pediatric Ewing Sarcoma. Cancer Discovery.
  • Tirode et al. (2014). Genomic Landscape of Ewing Sarcoma Defines an Aggressive Subtype with Co-Association of STAG2 and TP53 Mutations. Cancer Discovery.
  • Toretsky, and Wright (2014). Assemblages: functional units formed by cellular phase separation. The Journal of cell biology.
  • Monument et al. (2014). Clinical and Biochemical Function of Polymorphic NR0B1 GGAA-Microsatellites in Ewing Sarcoma: A Report from the Children\textquotesingles Oncology Group. {PLoS} {ONE}.
  • Brohl et al. (2014). The Genomic Landscape of the Ewing Sarcoma Family of Tumors Reveals Recurrent STAG2 Mutation. {PLoS} Genetics.
  • Shibuya et al. (2014). The combination of CD99 and NKX2.2, a transcriptional target of EWSR1-FLI1, is highly specific for the diagnosis of Ewing sarcoma. Virchows Archiv.
  • Kayarthodi et al. (2014). Anti-Epileptic Drug Targets Ewing Sarcoma. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Pharmacology.
  • Sankar et al. (2014). Reversible LSD1 inhibition interferes with global EWS/ETS transcriptional activity and impedes Ewing sarcoma tumor growth. Clin. Cancer Res.
  • Sankar et al. (2014). Reversible LSD1 inhibition interferes with global EWS/ETS transcriptional activity and impedes Ewing sarcoma tumor growth. Clin. Cancer Res.
  • Sankar et al. (2014). Reversible LSD1 Inhibition Interferes with Global EWS/ETS Transcriptional Activity and Impedes Ewing Sarcoma Tumor Growth. Clin. Cancer Res.
  • Arnaldez, and Helman (2014). New Strategies in Ewing Sarcoma: Lost in Translation?. Clin. Cancer Res.
  • Zhou et al. (2014). EWS-FLI-1 regulates the neuronal repressor gene REST, which controls Ewing sarcoma growth and vascular morphology. Cancer.
  • Walters et al. (2014). JARID2 is a direct target of the PAX3-FOXO1 fusion protein and inhibits myogenic differentiation of rhabdomyosarcoma cells. Oncogene.
  • Huether et al. (2014). The landscape of somatic mutations in epigenetic regulators across 1,000 paediatric cancer genomes. Nat. Commun.
  • Gorlick et al. (2013). Children\textquotesingles Oncology Group\textquotesingles 2013 blueprint for research: Bone tumors. Pediatric Blood {\&} Cancer.
  • Grohar et al. (2013). Dual Targeting of EWS-FLI1 Activity and the Associated DNA Damage Response with Trabectedin and SN38 Synergistically Inhibits Ewing Sarcoma Cell Growth. Clin. Cancer Res.
  • Stoll et al. (2013). Systems biology of Ewing sarcoma: a network model of EWS-FLI1 effect on proliferation and apoptosis. Nucleic Acids Res.
  • Niedan et al. (2013). Suppression of FOXO1 is responsible for a growth regulatory repressive transcriptional sub-signature of EWS-FLI1 in Ewing sarcoma. Oncogene.
  • Bilke et al. (2013). Oncogenic ETS fusions deregulate E2F3 target genes in Ewing sarcoma and prostate cancer. Genome Res.
  • Sankar et al. (2013). EWS and RE1-Silencing Transcription Factor Inhibit Neuronal Phenotype Development and Oncogenic Transformation in Ewing Sarcoma. Genes \& cancer.
  • Crompton et al. (2013). High-Throughput Tyrosine Kinase Activity Profiling Identifies FAK as a Candidate Therapeutic Target in Ewing Sarcoma. Cancer Res.
  • Borinstein (2013). A decade in banking Ewing sarcoma: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group. Frontiers in Oncology.
  • David et al. (2012). Oncostatin M is a growth factor for Ewing sarcoma. The American journal of pathology.
  • Sankar et al. (2012). Mechanism and relevance of EWS/FLI-mediated transcriptional repression in Ewing sarcoma. Oncogene.
  • De Vito et al. (2012). A TARBP2-dependent miRNA expression profile underlies cancer stem cell properties and provides candidate therapeutic reagents in Ewing sarcoma. Cancer Cell.
  • Lawlor, and Thiele (2012). Epigenetic changes in pediatric solid tumors: promising new targets. Clin. Cancer Res.
  • Reynolds et al. (2012). NuRD suppresses pluripotency gene expression to promote transcriptional heterogeneity and lineage commitment. Cell stem cell.
  • Baruchel et al. (2012). A phase 2 trial of trabectedin in children with recurrent rhabdomyosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma and non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas: A report from the Children’s Oncology Group. Eur. J. Cancer.
  • Barber-Rotenberg et al. (2012). Single Enantiomer of YK-4-279 Demonstrates Specificity in Targeting the Oncogene EWS-FLI1. Oncotarget.
  • Patel et al. (2012). Tumor-specific retargeting of an oncogenic transcription factor chimera results in dysregulation of chromatin and transcription. Genome Res.
  • Postel-Vinay et al. (2012). Common variants near TARDBP and EGR2 are associated with susceptibility to Ewing sarcoma. Nat. Genet.
  • Lessnick, and Ladanyi (2012). Molecular pathogenesis of Ewing sarcoma: new therapeutic and transcriptional targets. Annual review of pathology.
  • Juergens et al. (2011). Preliminary Efficacy of the Anti-Insulin–Like Growth Factor Type 1 Receptor Antibody Figitumumab in Patients With Refractory Ewing Sarcoma. J. Clin. Oncol.
  • Grohar et al. (2011). Identification of an Inhibitor of the EWS-FLI1 Oncogenic Transcription Factor by High-Throughput Screening. {JNCI} Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
  • Grohar et al. (2011). Ecteinascidin 743 Interferes with the Activity of EWS-FLI1 in Ewing Sarcoma Cells. Neoplasia.
  • von Levetzow et al. (2011). Modeling initiation of Ewing sarcoma in human neural crest cells. PLoS One.
  • Lin et al. (2011). Mesenchymal Stem Cells and the Origin of Ewing’s Sarcoma. Sarcoma.
  • Sankar, and Lessnick (2011). Promiscuous partnerships in Ewing’s sarcoma. .
  • Sankar, and Lessnick (2011). Promiscuous partnerships in Ewing’s sarcoma. .
  • Sankar, and Lessnick (2011). Promiscuous partnerships in Ewing’s sarcoma. .
  • Desai, and Jambhekar (2010). Pathology of Ewing’s sarcoma/PNET: Current opinion and emerging concepts. Indian journal of orthopaedics.
  • Erkizan et al. (2010). Oncogenic partnerships: EWS-FLI1 protein interactions initiate key pathways of Ewing’s sarcoma. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.
  • Ginsberg et al. (2010). Long-term Survivors of Childhood Ewing Sarcoma: Report From the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. {JNCI} Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
  • Riggi et al. (2010). EWS-FLI-1 modulates miRNA145 and SOX2 expression to initiate mesenchymal stem cell reprogramming toward Ewing sarcoma cancer stem cells. Genes Dev.
  • Le Deley et al. (2010). Impact of EWS-ETS fusion type on disease progression in Ewing’s sarcoma/peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumor: prospective results from the cooperative Euro-E.W.I.N.G. 99 trial. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
  • Balamuth, and Womer (2010). Ewing’s sarcoma. The lancet oncology.
  • Randall et al. (2010). Is There a Predisposition Gene for Ewing\textquotesingles Sarcoma?. Journal of Oncology.
  • Erkizan et al. (2009). A small molecule blocking oncogenic protein EWS-FLI1 interaction with RNA helicase A inhibits growth of Ewing\textquotesingles sarcoma. Nature Medicine.
  • Johnson et al. (2009). Parental Age and Risk of Childhood Cancer. Epidemiology.
  • DuBois et al. (2009). Phase II study of intermediate-dose cytarabine in patients with relapsed or refractory Ewing sarcoma: A report from the Children\textquotesingles Oncology Group. Pediatric Blood {\&} Cancer.
  • Houghton (2009). How do we identify novel treatment for childhood cancer?. Pediatric Blood {\&} Cancer.
  • Suva et al. (2009). Identification of Cancer Stem Cells in Ewing’s Sarcoma. Cancer Res.
  • Guillon et al. (2009). The oncogenic EWS-FLI1 protein binds in vivo GGAA microsatellite sequences with potential transcriptional activation function. PLoS One.
  • Gangwal et al. (2008). Microsatellites as EWS/FLI response elements in Ewing’s sarcoma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
  • Esiashvili et al. (2008). Changes in Incidence and Survival of Ewing Sarcoma Patients Over the Past 3 Decades. Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology.
  • Owen et al. (2008). EWS/FLI mediates transcriptional repression via NKX2.2 during oncogenic transformation in Ewing’s sarcoma. PLoS One.
  • Stegmaier et al. (2007). Signature-Based Small Molecule Screening Identifies Cytosine Arabinoside as an EWS/FLI Modulator in Ewing Sarcoma. {PLoS} Medicine.
  • Kinsey et al. (2006). NR0B1 is required for the oncogenic phenotype mediated by EWS/FLI in Ewing’s sarcoma. Molecular cancer research : MCR.
  • Kennedy, and D\textquotesingleAndrea (2006). DNA Repair Pathways in Clinical Practice: Lessons From Pediatric Cancer Susceptibility Syndromes. J. Clin. Oncol.
  • Smith et al. (2006). Expression profiling of EWS/FLI identifies NKX2.2 as a critical target gene in Ewing’s sarcoma. Cancer Cell.
  • Braunreiter et al. (2006). Expression of EWS-ETS Fusions in NIH3T3 Cells Reveals Significant Differences to Ewing’s Sarcoma ND SC RIB. .
  • Owen, and Lessnick (2006). Identification of target genes in their native cellular context. .
  • Khoury (2005). Ewing sarcoma family of tumors. Adv. Anat. Pathol.
  • Torchia et al. (2003). Ewing tumor fusion proteins block the differentiation of pluripotent marrow stromal cells. Cancer research.
  • Lessnick et al. (2002). The Ewing’s sarcoma oncoprotein EWS/FLI induces a p53-dependent growth arrest in primary human fibroblasts. Cancer Cell.
  • Potter et al. (2000). Identification and characterization of a new human ETS-family transcription factor, TEL2, that is expressed in hematopoietic tissues and can associate with TEL1/ETV6. Blood.
  • Amann et al. (1999). Relation of neurological marker expression and EWS gene fusion types in MIC2/CD99-positive tumors of the Ewing family. Hum. Pathol.
  • Sharrocks et al. (1997). The ETS-domain transcription factor family. The international journal of biochemistry \& cell biology.
  • Toretsky et al. (1997). The Insulin-like Growth Factor-I Receptor Is Required for EWS/FLI-1 Transformation of Fibroblasts. J. Biol. Chem.
  • Lessnick et al. (1995). Multiple domains mediate transformation by the Ewing’s sarcoma EWS/FLI-1 fusion gene. Oncogene.
  • May et al. (1993). The Ewing’s sarcoma EWS/FLI-1 fusion gene encodes a more potent transcriptional activator and is a more powerful transforming gene than FLI-1. Mol. Cell. Biol.
  • May et al. (1993). Ewing sarcoma 11;22 translocation produces a chimeric transcription factor that requires the DNA-binding domain encoded by FLI1 for transformation.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
  • Delattre et al. (1992). Gene fusion with an ETS DNA-binding domain caused by chromosome translocation in human tumours. Nature.
  • Rud et al. (1989). Extraosseous Ewing’s sarcoma. A study of 42 cases. Cancer.
  • Askin et al. (1979). Malignant small cell tumor of the thoracopulmonary region in childhood.A distinctive clinicopathologic entity of uncertain histogenesis. Cancer.
  • Olisa et al. (1975). Malignant Tumors in American Black and Nigerian Children: A Comparative Study. Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
  • Fraumeni, and Glass (1970). Rarity of Ewing’s sarcoma among U.S. Negro children. Lancet (London, England).
  • Ewing (1921). Diffuse endothelioma of bone. Proc New York Path.
  • Stout (1918). A tumor of the ulnar nerve. .